May 22, 2025 - Research
Many small sustainability teams are constantly balancing limited time, budget constraints and changing carbon markets guidance and policy. Today, ever more resources are spent reporting emissions rather than reducing them. Even when emissions can be reduced, many organizations still find unaddressed, residual emissions remain at the end of the year.
Carbon credits offer a way to address those remaining emissions. However, many buyers face legitimate concerns regarding credibility, cost and the effort involved to perform due diligence. This post explains how small teams can meet stakeholder expectations, stay within budget and purchase high-quality credits without adding unnecessary complexity.
Offsetting is neither a silver bullet nor a substitute for decarbonization efforts. However, it can help corporates deliver near-term climate and social impact. Even the most ambitious decarbonization efforts leave behind emissions that cannot be eliminated completely.
Addressing these residual emissions through high-quality carbon credits allows organizations to:
Despite carbon credits’ ability to help deliver on a decarbonization strategy, competing priorities often mean offsets are the last action before reporting deadlines. As a result, the process needs to be efficient, affordable and defensible.
Reporting season for sustainability teams comes fast and preparing a portfolio of high-integrity carbon credits is often a crunch-time exercise. Carbon credit purchase decisions tend to be:
Carbon credit ratings are one way to streamline the process. Ratings agencies allow teams to quickly search for carbon credits that match a number of criteria, including high GHG integrity, contributing to specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) or environmental or social safeguards. Some, such as Calyx Global, also provide available inventory and pricing data. Perhaps most importantly, carbon credit ratings agencies deliver independent, science-based due diligence, helping you ensure the GHG integrity of purchased carbon credits.
The voluntary carbon market has evolved significantly in recent years. However, buyers still face a complex landscape marked by variability in quality, inconsistent claims and mixed public perceptions.
While carbon credits can deliver real climate impact, the market’s history has shown that not all credits are equal. Some projects have made meaningful contributions to reducing or removing emissions. Others have been criticized for overstating their impact or lacking transparency, leading to reputational risks for buyers.
This inconsistency has left many sustainability professionals questioning how to proceed – especially when time, budget and expertise are limited.
At the same time, market oversight is improving in certain areas. Initiatives such as the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) and Carbon Credit Quality Initiative (CCQI) are working to set clearer definitions of quality. Independent carbon credit ratings from providers like Calyx Global offer buyers data-driven assessments to help compare projects and make informed choices.
These tools make it easier for busy teams to navigate the market without needing to become carbon credit experts. They provide a more consistent, transparent foundation for making purchasing decisions that align with both climate goals and organizational expectations.
The climate crisis is accelerating and global progress remains off track to meet global climate goals. According to the latest science, global emissions must fall by nearly half by 2030 to keep the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement within reach. Yet emissions continue to rise in many sectors.
While long-term decarbonization pathways are essential, the reality is that we need both immediate and sustained action. Every year of inaction increases the scale and cost of future mitigation.
High-quality carbon credits are an available tool to deliver near-term climate impact today – especially for residual emissions that cannot yet be fully eliminated.
In addition to reducing or removing carbon, many high-quality projects provide measurable benefits for communities and ecosystems. These beyond carbon benefits may include:
By investing in these projects, organizations can deliver value beyond carbon – supporting broader environmental, social and economic outcomes aligned with their sustainability commitments.
Carbon credits can play a role in addressing the emissions that organizations cannot yet eliminate. Yet for many small sustainability teams, carbon markets can feel like a moving target: technically complex, politically scrutinized and operationally overwhelming.
The good news is that today’s market offers clearer tools, independent carbon credit ratings, partners and emerging global standards that help make carbon credit purchasing more manageable and credible. You do not need to become a carbon market expert to make informed decisions. What you do need are trusted signals of quality and partners who can help you navigate the process with confidence.
Rigorous, independent, science-based due diligence can, in the long run, save time and money spent sourcing carbon credits.
Carbon credits – when sourced responsibly – offer a practical way to advance your goals today, while continuing to invest in the deep, long-term decarbonization your stakeholders expect. With the right tools and partnerships, carbon credit purchasing can move from a last-minute task to a confident part of your climate leadership strategy.
You can start by defining what quality means for your organization, including GHG integrity and any beyond carbon benefits you value. To learn more, follow our step-by-step guide to sourcing high-quality carbon credits.
Keep up with carbon market trends
Get the monthly newsletter and stay in the loop.
Trusted By