Analyzing the greenhouse gas impact of carbon credits
Calyx Global GHG ratings are an assessment of risk that credits do not
represent one tonne of removed or reduced CO₂. Our overarching
evaluation framework has been peer-reviewed by leading carbon
methodology experts and is used to build project type-specific
frameworks that ensure consistency in our rating approach.
Our project-level assessments evaluate four risk factors that are
consistent with the ICVCM’s core carbon principles:
Sustainable Development Goal impact of carbon credits
The UN adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets aimed at
creating a healthier planet and equitable society. We evaluate and
provide a rating for every individual SDG claim made by a project, down
to the target level - so you can invest with confidence in carbon
credits that support your goals.
Our SDG analysis evaluates the level of impact achieved and the quality
of evidence provided, including:
Level of change achieved
How a project's activities lead to targeted change and impact
Methodology used to monitor SDGs contributions
Quality of reported evidence
Screening for environmental and social risks
Environmental and social safeguards protect people and areas impacted by a carbon project from harm, and are an integral part of carbon credit quality. Our analysis of environmental and social risks covers 10 risk areas and 55 sub-areas, going far beyond today’s requirements of any carbon crediting program. By evaluating risk beyond GHG, you are protecting your reputation, people and places on multiple dimensions.
Our screening and analysis:
Looks at factors that affect risk far beyond the most rigorous carbon crediting program
Aligns with international best practices on safeguards
Has multiple levels of screening and analysis options
Includes labor rights, health, safety and security, land rights, biodiversity, transparency and benefit sharing, access to justice and more