Why the carbon market's "ugly ducklings" are becoming its biggest success stories.
Calyx Global has to date assessed and rated 1010 carbon projects across 33 different project types. Projects rated include removals and avoided emissions across nature-based to technology-based project types, from 25 different crediting programs and 316 methodologies. When accounting for ratings of different carbon credit vintages, we have 1147 GHG ratings.
We find variability of quality no matter what parameter is selected (type, standard, country, CORSIA eligibility and more). Sometimes the variability goes all the way from high risk (i.e. poor quality) to low risk, sometimes it is less broad, but a range (distribution) is nearly always there. While quality credits can be found in today’s market, there are few credit types that consistently deliver high quality.
The same remark is valid for the contribution to SDGs. Among the 471 certified projects we've rated (e.g., CCB, SD VISta, Gold Standard for the Global Goals), we find differences in the degree of impact and level of evidence provided. This leads to Calyx SDG Ratings from +1 to +5, with +5 being the best rating that can be obtained in our framework.
Below are two charts that show a distribution of Calyx Ratings. These charts will be updated as our coverage grows.
GHG Risk Rating Distribution
SDG Impact Rating Distribution
About the author
Calyx Global
Keep up with carbon market trends
Get the monthly newsletter and stay in the loop.
Trusted By


Next Up
"Integrity and impartiality are the priority": How McGill St. Laurent backs up its carbon trading desk with third-party trust
July 22, 2026
Superpollutants Season 2: Revisiting a critical part of the carbon markets
July 16, 2026
“What's behind the rating”: Why Shell trusts Calyx Global for detailed analysis
July 13, 2026